4) Artistic interpretations are fine as long as they don't conflict with the above criteria
Overall Presentation |
The sum of the layers is significantly more enhanced than the layers individually (3 pts) |
The sum of the layers is slightly more enhanced than the layers individually (2 pts) |
There is little or no difference between layers (1 pt) |
|
The final image shows distinct qualities of all layers that greatly enhance the final image (3 pts) |
Some blending occurs between all layers but some aspects are unclear or do not enhance the final image (2 pts) |
blending layers was attempted (1 pt) |
|
Multiple areas of the image show enhanced fine line details (3 pts) |
One or two areas of the image show enhanced details (2 pts) |
Enhanced detail was not successful (1 pt) |
|
Significant success was made on enhancing dark regions or reducing glare on bright areas without sacrificing the quality of the image (3 pts) |
Some success was made on enhancing dark regions or reducing glare on bright areas but some sacrificing of the quality of the image occurs (2 pts) |
Attempts were made to manage bright or dark areas but significant washouts or dark regions remain (1 pts) |
|
Color choices enhance the quality of the image AND colors blend well together AND do not 'wash out' or overwhelm other color regions (3 pts) |
Color choices enhance the quality of the image or colors blend well together or do not 'wash out' or overwhelm other color regions (2 pts) |
Color choices distract from the quality of the image or colors do not blend well together or colors 'wash out' or overwhelm other color regions (1 pts) |
| Layer Functionality |
No inactive layers are present (4 pts) |
One inactive layer is present (3 pts) |
Two inactive layers are present (2 pts
|
More than two inactive layers are present (1 pt_
|
When you make a substantial change to your image, you MUST document that by doing a screen shot and pasting that into a work document that you will submit to me later.